Comments on: Using progressive enhancement with Flash http://blog.deconcept.com/2006/09/12/using-progressive-enhancement-flash/ You've got your good thing, and I've got mine Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:21:16 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: resimler http://blog.deconcept.com/2006/09/12/using-progressive-enhancement-flash/#comment-21061 resimler Sat, 01 Mar 2008 08:55:51 +0000 http://blog.deconcept.com/2006/09/12/using-progressive-enhancement-flash/#comment-21061 nice nice

]]> By: resimler http://blog.deconcept.com/2006/09/12/using-progressive-enhancement-flash/#comment-21060 resimler Sat, 01 Mar 2008 08:53:00 +0000 http://blog.deconcept.com/2006/09/12/using-progressive-enhancement-flash/#comment-21060 thanx thanx

]]> By: Alanya http://blog.deconcept.com/2006/09/12/using-progressive-enhancement-flash/#comment-20469 Alanya Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:07:58 +0000 http://blog.deconcept.com/2006/09/12/using-progressive-enhancement-flash/#comment-20469 Fast forward to around 24:00 to hear my part Fast forward to around 24:00 to hear my part

]]> By: Kurtlar Vadisi http://blog.deconcept.com/2006/09/12/using-progressive-enhancement-flash/#comment-20267 Kurtlar Vadisi Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:14:37 +0000 http://blog.deconcept.com/2006/09/12/using-progressive-enhancement-flash/#comment-20267 I had a hiccup with a .htaccess file, it’s working now. I had a hiccup with a .htaccess file, it’s working now.

]]> By: toys http://blog.deconcept.com/2006/09/12/using-progressive-enhancement-flash/#comment-19789 toys Mon, 31 Dec 2007 10:51:58 +0000 http://blog.deconcept.com/2006/09/12/using-progressive-enhancement-flash/#comment-19789 This is fantastic help – thank you very much. Getting the search engines to pick up flash sites is really definitely something that is very useful. Also, supporting viewers without flash. Although, I find it strange that some people don't have flash. Flash has become quite a standard these days, if you ask me, and most people do have it installed. Still, there are probably a few die-hards out there who just blatantly refuse to do so. Weird. Great information here, thanks again. This is fantastic help – thank you very much. Getting the search engines to pick up flash sites is really definitely something that is very useful. Also, supporting viewers without flash. Although, I find it strange that some people don’t have flash. Flash has become quite a standard these days, if you ask me, and most people do have it installed.
Still, there are probably a few die-hards out there who just blatantly refuse to do so. Weird. Great information here, thanks again.

]]> By: dll download http://blog.deconcept.com/2006/09/12/using-progressive-enhancement-flash/#comment-18963 dll download Fri, 30 Nov 2007 02:53:51 +0000 http://blog.deconcept.com/2006/09/12/using-progressive-enhancement-flash/#comment-18963 too much flash / javascript kill my ie. too much flash / javascript kill my ie.

]]> By: Asiatique http://blog.deconcept.com/2006/09/12/using-progressive-enhancement-flash/#comment-17410 Asiatique Thu, 27 Sep 2007 07:40:55 +0000 http://blog.deconcept.com/2006/09/12/using-progressive-enhancement-flash/#comment-17410 Thank for the link, this is a good project for SWFObject. Thank for the link, this is a good project for SWFObject.

]]> By: Michael Kaufman http://blog.deconcept.com/2006/09/12/using-progressive-enhancement-flash/#comment-14858 Michael Kaufman Mon, 23 Oct 2006 18:24:51 +0000 http://blog.deconcept.com/2006/09/12/using-progressive-enhancement-flash/#comment-14858 Hi Geoff, Thanks for your contribution the world, really, with SWFObject. I have two questions I'm hoping you can answer. 1. You say that search engines spider the DIV (alt.content), right? So, I'm wondering, if I put the metadata that flash "would" generate, (eg. <div id=”videoplayer”> <rdf :RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"><rdf :Description rdf:about="" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/1.1/"><dc :title>2007 Chevrolet Corvette</dc><dc :description>2007 Chevrolet Corvette video </dc></rdf></rdf> </div> I'm not sure if this doctype is unique to Flash and would tell the browser "here is some Flash in this html page, and also here is some metadata describing it. What are you thoughts on this becuase I'm thinking for my video, i just use one swf and changing metadata evertime is not an option, that maybe I can "kill two birds with one stone" by embedded the flash metadata in the SWFObject DIV (alt.content). Do you have any thoughts on if this would work? If it would, i would just dynamically change what's in the DIV each time. 2nd Question has to do with SWFObject in Firefox. I notice that when placing transparent Flash content in an iFrame and positioning absolutely over a page, that the flash object stays even though i put a blank keyframe to have no content when the movie is done. Here is an example. www.edmunds.com > New Car landing page and look at the Flash content in the header. In IE, after the flash plays our header is clickable. In Firefox, the object remains and content underneath is not clickable. Any idea of a workaround on how I would "delete or hide" the SWFObject when the movie is done? Hope this makes sense. //Michael Kaufman Hi Geoff,
Thanks for your contribution the world, really, with SWFObject. I have two questions I’m hoping you can answer. 1. You say that search engines spider the DIV (alt.content), right? So, I’m wondering, if I put the metadata that flash “would” generate, (eg.

2007 Chevrolet Corvette2007 Chevrolet Corvette video

I’m not sure if this doctype is unique to Flash and would tell the browser “here is some Flash in this html page, and also here is some metadata describing it. What are you thoughts on this becuase I’m thinking for my video, i just use one swf and changing metadata evertime is not an option, that maybe I can “kill two birds with one stone” by embedded the flash metadata in the SWFObject DIV (alt.content). Do you have any thoughts on if this would work? If it would, i would just dynamically change what’s in the DIV each time. 2nd Question has to do with SWFObject in Firefox. I notice that when placing transparent Flash content in an iFrame and positioning absolutely over a page, that the flash object stays even though i put a blank keyframe to have no content when the movie is done. Here is an example. http://www.edmunds.com > New Car landing page and look at the Flash content in the header. In IE, after the flash plays our header is clickable. In Firefox, the object remains and content underneath is not clickable. Any idea of a workaround on how I would “delete or hide” the SWFObject when the movie is done? Hope this makes sense.

//Michael Kaufman

]]> By: Geoff http://blog.deconcept.com/2006/09/12/using-progressive-enhancement-flash/#comment-14825 Geoff Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:08:26 +0000 http://blog.deconcept.com/2006/09/12/using-progressive-enhancement-flash/#comment-14825 I had a hiccup with a .htaccess file, it's working now. I had a hiccup with a .htaccess file, it’s working now.

]]> By: Darren http://blog.deconcept.com/2006/09/12/using-progressive-enhancement-flash/#comment-14824 Darren Thu, 12 Oct 2006 14:41:48 +0000 http://blog.deconcept.com/2006/09/12/using-progressive-enhancement-flash/#comment-14824 I can't access your swfobject link, has the folder been removed? I can’t access your swfobject link, has the folder been removed?

]]>