<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flash vs. Ajax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.deconcept.com/2007/01/03/flash-vs-ajax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.deconcept.com/2007/01/03/flash-vs-ajax/</link>
	<description>You've got your good thing, and I've got mine</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 13:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alanya</title>
		<link>http://blog.deconcept.com/2007/01/03/flash-vs-ajax/#comment-20462</link>
		<dc:creator>Alanya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 04:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.deconcept.com/2007/01/03/flash-vs-ajax/#comment-20462</guid>
		<description>Those who choose to take the “slights and disappointments” path, meanwhile, are very generously compensated for their trouble</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those who choose to take the “slights and disappointments” path, meanwhile, are very generously compensated for their trouble</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: juegos</title>
		<link>http://blog.deconcept.com/2007/01/03/flash-vs-ajax/#comment-20444</link>
		<dc:creator>juegos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 14:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.deconcept.com/2007/01/03/flash-vs-ajax/#comment-20444</guid>
		<description>Congratulations from me also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations from me also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chrissy Auto</title>
		<link>http://blog.deconcept.com/2007/01/03/flash-vs-ajax/#comment-20100</link>
		<dc:creator>Chrissy Auto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 01:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.deconcept.com/2007/01/03/flash-vs-ajax/#comment-20100</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://plentyofthings.blogspot.com"&gt;Plenty of interesting things&lt;/a&gt; here! I had no idea that Flickr originally had a flash-based setup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://plentyofthings.blogspot.com">Plenty of interesting things</a> here! I had no idea that Flickr originally had a flash-based setup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pars Narko Terör</title>
		<link>http://blog.deconcept.com/2007/01/03/flash-vs-ajax/#comment-19963</link>
		<dc:creator>Pars Narko Terör</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 23:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.deconcept.com/2007/01/03/flash-vs-ajax/#comment-19963</guid>
		<description>thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Legal Software</title>
		<link>http://blog.deconcept.com/2007/01/03/flash-vs-ajax/#comment-19456</link>
		<dc:creator>Legal Software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 19:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.deconcept.com/2007/01/03/flash-vs-ajax/#comment-19456</guid>
		<description>thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tvler</title>
		<link>http://blog.deconcept.com/2007/01/03/flash-vs-ajax/#comment-19302</link>
		<dc:creator>tvler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 23:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.deconcept.com/2007/01/03/flash-vs-ajax/#comment-19302</guid>
		<description>Good point the job 
&lt;a href="http://www.televizyonizle.gen.tr" title="canlı televizyon izle"&gt;televizyon izle&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point the job<br />
<a href="http://www.televizyonizle.gen.tr" title="canlı televizyon izle">televizyon izle</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lyrics, song, love song</title>
		<link>http://blog.deconcept.com/2007/01/03/flash-vs-ajax/#comment-18983</link>
		<dc:creator>lyrics, song, love song</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 11:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.deconcept.com/2007/01/03/flash-vs-ajax/#comment-18983</guid>
		<description>lyrics, song, love song - www.songstime.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lyrics, song, love song - <a href="http://www.songstime.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.songstime.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 公务员考试</title>
		<link>http://blog.deconcept.com/2007/01/03/flash-vs-ajax/#comment-18965</link>
		<dc:creator>公务员考试</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 03:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.deconcept.com/2007/01/03/flash-vs-ajax/#comment-18965</guid>
		<description>I kind like flash, when I visit some website full of javascript, always have some error show up. and I can't access that site at all!!
And my browser will be very slow.
so , flash is much better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kind like flash, when I visit some website full of javascript, always have some error show up. and I can&#8217;t access that site at all!!<br />
And my browser will be very slow.<br />
so , flash is much better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abiye</title>
		<link>http://blog.deconcept.com/2007/01/03/flash-vs-ajax/#comment-18741</link>
		<dc:creator>abiye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 13:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.deconcept.com/2007/01/03/flash-vs-ajax/#comment-18741</guid>
		<description>Thanks!
&lt;a href="http://www.abiye.cc" rel=""&gt;abiye&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.abiye.cc" rel=""&gt;gelinlik&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!<br />
<a href="http://www.abiye.cc" rel="">abiye</a><br />
<a href="http://www.abiye.cc" rel="">gelinlik</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://blog.deconcept.com/2007/01/03/flash-vs-ajax/#comment-18374</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 19:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.deconcept.com/2007/01/03/flash-vs-ajax/#comment-18374</guid>
		<description>Good point the job</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point the job</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yemek Tarifleri</title>
		<link>http://blog.deconcept.com/2007/01/03/flash-vs-ajax/#comment-17836</link>
		<dc:creator>Yemek Tarifleri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 03:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.deconcept.com/2007/01/03/flash-vs-ajax/#comment-17836</guid>
		<description>Good point - why make your job any harder? I recently made a nice little calendar / date range chooser in Flash in about an hour - it would have taken forever in JS/HTML!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point - why make your job any harder? I recently made a nice little calendar / date range chooser in Flash in about an hour - it would have taken forever in JS/HTML!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruby</title>
		<link>http://blog.deconcept.com/2007/01/03/flash-vs-ajax/#comment-17351</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 01:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.deconcept.com/2007/01/03/flash-vs-ajax/#comment-17351</guid>
		<description>Very well said. It is a tool - both are tools - and they have their place with different pieces. Flash excels for video/audio presentations and are (in my opinion) the best tools to use for the job. However, there are other places where it might not be the best tool. It’s not that they are purely evil (AJAX/Flash) - it’s just that they have taken so much abuse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well said. It is a tool - both are tools - and they have their place with different pieces. Flash excels for video/audio presentations and are (in my opinion) the best tools to use for the job. However, there are other places where it might not be the best tool. It’s not that they are purely evil (AJAX/Flash) - it’s just that they have taken so much abuse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: open source</title>
		<link>http://blog.deconcept.com/2007/01/03/flash-vs-ajax/#comment-17119</link>
		<dc:creator>open source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 00:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.deconcept.com/2007/01/03/flash-vs-ajax/#comment-17119</guid>
		<description>"looking at it from a site-wide perspective", so is it right. Make an interesting and handy site for your &lt;b&gt;visitors&lt;/b&gt;. Different technics to different themes. We has it done &lt;a href="http://open-source.optionextreme.net/"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;looking at it from a site-wide perspective&#8221;, so is it right. Make an interesting and handy site for your <b>visitors</b>. Different technics to different themes. We has it done <a href="http://open-source.optionextreme.net/">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellen</title>
		<link>http://blog.deconcept.com/2007/01/03/flash-vs-ajax/#comment-16509</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 00:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.deconcept.com/2007/01/03/flash-vs-ajax/#comment-16509</guid>
		<description>You make a great point with Flickr but I think that Flash will win this cage match for photos and videos online because of the ease of use and that to me is what makes things on the web excel. Like Wordpress for example the ease of use makes it a great blogging platform and adding widgets like Flickr are as easy as 1 2 3..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make a great point with Flickr but I think that Flash will win this cage match for photos and videos online because of the ease of use and that to me is what makes things on the web excel. Like Wordpress for example the ease of use makes it a great blogging platform and adding widgets like Flickr are as easy as 1 2 3..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Konopacki</title>
		<link>http://blog.deconcept.com/2007/01/03/flash-vs-ajax/#comment-15810</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Konopacki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 21:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.deconcept.com/2007/01/03/flash-vs-ajax/#comment-15810</guid>
		<description>While I agree that it would be a bit daffed to build an extensive application trying to utilize Javascript/AJAX to communication with Flash, and vis-a-vis, I'm not sure that was the point which was trying to be made. "The right tool for the right job" means that you look at the scope of your over-arching project and determine what the business objectives are. If those objectives would be better suited for an all Flash application, then that might be the best route. If it's AJAX, then so be it. Some, like the Google Financial app, are most suited to a hybrid version. So perhaps the mantra is actually inaccurate, and can be better stated in this way: "The right implementation to meet the business objectives".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree that it would be a bit daffed to build an extensive application trying to utilize Javascript/AJAX to communication with Flash, and vis-a-vis, I&#8217;m not sure that was the point which was trying to be made. &#8220;The right tool for the right job&#8221; means that you look at the scope of your over-arching project and determine what the business objectives are. If those objectives would be better suited for an all Flash application, then that might be the best route. If it&#8217;s AJAX, then so be it. Some, like the Google Financial app, are most suited to a hybrid version. So perhaps the mantra is actually inaccurate, and can be better stated in this way: &#8220;The right implementation to meet the business objectives&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ss2</title>
		<link>http://blog.deconcept.com/2007/01/03/flash-vs-ajax/#comment-15576</link>
		<dc:creator>ss2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 18:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.deconcept.com/2007/01/03/flash-vs-ajax/#comment-15576</guid>
		<description>ExternalInterface for javascript/flash communication - is that the way to go? Or the Flash Javascript toolkit - at http://weblogs.macromedia.com/flashjavascript/ - Is the ExternalInterface supported on linux as well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ExternalInterface for javascript/flash communication - is that the way to go? Or the Flash Javascript toolkit - at <a href="http://weblogs.macromedia.com/flashjavascript/" rel="nofollow">http://weblogs.macromedia.com/flashjavascript/</a> - Is the ExternalInterface supported on linux as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marvin Marcelo</title>
		<link>http://blog.deconcept.com/2007/01/03/flash-vs-ajax/#comment-15163</link>
		<dc:creator>Marvin Marcelo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 00:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.deconcept.com/2007/01/03/flash-vs-ajax/#comment-15163</guid>
		<description>Nothing to say, very well said!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing to say, very well said!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hipopotomatoe</title>
		<link>http://blog.deconcept.com/2007/01/03/flash-vs-ajax/#comment-15149</link>
		<dc:creator>Hipopotomatoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 02:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.deconcept.com/2007/01/03/flash-vs-ajax/#comment-15149</guid>
		<description>Some kind of color blindness or optical chlamydia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some kind of color blindness or optical chlamydia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fat Fingers</title>
		<link>http://blog.deconcept.com/2007/01/03/flash-vs-ajax/#comment-15107</link>
		<dc:creator>Fat Fingers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.deconcept.com/2007/01/03/flash-vs-ajax/#comment-15107</guid>
		<description>This may be a daft question, but why would anyones default text color be white ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may be a daft question, but why would anyones default text color be white ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timo Mikkolainen</title>
		<link>http://blog.deconcept.com/2007/01/03/flash-vs-ajax/#comment-15105</link>
		<dc:creator>Timo Mikkolainen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.deconcept.com/2007/01/03/flash-vs-ajax/#comment-15105</guid>
		<description>Your blog defines the bg color but not the text color. As my default text color is white, this results in white-on-white text. Please add 'color: #000000;' to the body-element in your css.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your blog defines the bg color but not the text color. As my default text color is white, this results in white-on-white text. Please add &#8216;color: #000000;&#8217; to the body-element in your css.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
