<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>deconcept &#187; apple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.deconcept.com/category/apple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.deconcept.com</link>
	<description>You&#039;ve got your good thing, and I&#039;ve got mine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:14:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>SWFMacMouseWheel SWFObject add-on</title>
		<link>http://blog.deconcept.com/2006/11/08/swfmacmousewheel-swfobject-add-on/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.deconcept.com/2006/11/08/swfmacmousewheel-swfobject-add-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 01:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[javascript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swfobject]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.deconcept.com/2006/11/08/swfmacmousewheel-swfobject-add-on/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever wanted to have mouse wheel support for your Flash movies in OS X? Now you can! And it&#8217;s really easy: SWFMacMouseWheel is another addon for SWFObject that listens for mouse events and passes in the mouse wheel events to &#8230; <a href="http://blog.deconcept.com/2006/11/08/swfmacmousewheel-swfobject-add-on/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever wanted to have mouse wheel support for your Flash movies in OS X? Now you can! And it&#8217;s really easy:</p>
<p>SWFMacMouseWheel is another addon for SWFObject that listens for mouse events and passes in the mouse wheel events to your Flash movie using ExternalInterface. Very cool solution to a problem that has annoyed many Flash developers. Go check it out.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.pixelbreaker.com/2006/11/08/flash/swfmacmousewheel/">SWFMacMouseWheel</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.deconcept.com/2006/11/08/swfmacmousewheel-swfobject-add-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Adobe release a version of Adobe Creative Suite 2 for Macintosh computers that use Intel processors?</title>
		<link>http://blog.deconcept.com/2006/01/25/will-adobe-release-version-adobe-creative-suite-2-macintosh-computers-that-use-intel-processors/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.deconcept.com/2006/01/25/will-adobe-release-version-adobe-creative-suite-2-macintosh-computers-that-use-intel-processors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 19:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoshop]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.deconcept.com/2006/01/25/will-adobe-release-version-adobe-creative-suite-2-macintosh-computers-that-use-intel-processors/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Answer: Adobe currently has no plans to update Adobe Creative Suite 2 or any other currently available Adobe products to support Macintosh computers that use Intel processors. Instead, we plan on investing in preparing future versions of our Macintosh products &#8230; <a href="http://blog.deconcept.com/2006/01/25/will-adobe-release-version-adobe-creative-suite-2-macintosh-computers-that-use-intel-processors/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Answer: <a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/notesfrommnr/2005/09/adobe_plug-ins.html" rel="external"><strong>Adobe currently has no plans to update Adobe Creative Suite 2</strong> or any other currently available Adobe products to support Macintosh computers that use Intel processors. Instead, we plan on investing in preparing future versions of our Macintosh products for this new line of computers.</a></p>
<p>Lame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.deconcept.com/2006/01/25/will-adobe-release-version-adobe-creative-suite-2-macintosh-computers-that-use-intel-processors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My sweet new iTunes phone!</title>
		<link>http://blog.deconcept.com/2005/10/03/my-sweet-new-itunes-phone/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.deconcept.com/2005/10/03/my-sweet-new-itunes-phone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 02:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nerdery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.deconcept.com/2005/10/03/my-sweet-new-itunes-phone/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was a little dissapointed at the iTunes phone (ROKR) stats. Who only wants to listen to 100 songs? Puhleese. Check out these exclusive shots of my new iPhonePod. It&#8217;s got all the features of a RAZR, and all the &#8230; <a href="http://blog.deconcept.com/2005/10/03/my-sweet-new-itunes-phone/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was a little dissapointed at the iTunes phone (ROKR) stats. Who only wants to listen to 100 songs? Puhleese.</p>
<p>Check out these exclusive shots of my new iPhonePod. It&#8217;s got all the features of a RAZR, and all the features of a 4GB iPod nano.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tensafefrogs/49199489/in/photostream/"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/25/49199489_3a8e943bf3.jpg?v=0" alt="iPodPhone closeup" /></a></p>
<p>So sweet. (click the pics to go to Flickr and comment if you like)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tensafefrogs/49199490/in/photostream/"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/30/49199490_143c4aa7da.jpg?v=0" alt="Me talking to someone very important about something very important" /></a></p>
<p>Here is me talking to someone very important about something very important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.deconcept.com/2005/10/03/my-sweet-new-itunes-phone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Safari&#8217;s hidden debug menu</title>
		<link>http://blog.deconcept.com/2005/07/28/safaris-hidden-debug-menu/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.deconcept.com/2005/07/28/safaris-hidden-debug-menu/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2005 04:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[javascript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safari]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.deconcept.com/2005/07/28/safaris-hidden-debug-menu/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trouble debugging your Javascript in Safari? Me too! That&#8217;s why I found this little tip useful (notice I say &#8216;useful&#8217; and not &#8216;very useful&#8217;). Safari is usually a very large pain when building Javascript apps. There are many small issues &#8230; <a href="http://blog.deconcept.com/2005/07/28/safaris-hidden-debug-menu/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trouble debugging your Javascript in Safari? Me too! That&#8217;s why I found this little tip useful (notice I say &#8216;useful&#8217; and not &#8216;very useful&#8217;).</p>
<p>Safari is usually a very large pain when building Javascript apps. There are many <a href="http://blog.deconcept.com/2005/03/25/safari-and-links-to-elements-in-overflow-auto-content">small issues</a> that seem to pop up all the time. But now with the release of Safari 2.0, you have a bit of help. Safari now has a Javascript console! It&#8217;s nothing fancy, and the errors it shows are sometimes less than optimal, but it&#8217;s far better than just guessing randomly at the problem.</p>
<p>To enable the Javascript console, first you must enable Safari&#8217;s debug menu. Do this by opening your Terminal and inputting this line:<br />
<code>
<pre>defaults write com.apple.Safari IncludeDebugMenu 1</pre>
<p></code></p>
<p>Now the next time you start Safari, you&#8217;ll have an extra menu up top called &#8220;Debug&#8221; and inside are all kinds of goodies. Here&#8217;s what the menu looks like:</p>
<p><img src="http://blog.deconcept.com/images/2005/07/safari_debug_menu.gif" alt="Safari debug menu" /></p>
<p>Back to the original point of this post, one of the items is &#8220;Show JavaScript Console&#8221; and selecting that item opens up this little window:</p>
<p><img src="http://blog.deconcept.com/images/2005/07/safari_js_console.gif" alt="Safari Javascript Console" /></p>
<p>It&#8217;s not nearly as sleek and useful as the Firefox/Mozilla Javascript console, but it&#8217;s a step in the right direction, and definitely better than nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.deconcept.com/2005/07/28/safaris-hidden-debug-menu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MTV Movie Awards, new software, and Flash Forward</title>
		<link>http://blog.deconcept.com/2005/05/18/mtv-movie-awards-new-software-flash-forward/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.deconcept.com/2005/05/18/mtv-movie-awards-new-software-flash-forward/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2005 04:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.deconcept.com/2005/05/18/mtv-movie-awards-new-software-flash-forward/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Talk about a busy month! I&#8217;ve been completely swamped with work on the MTV Movie awards website. I also upgraded my Powerbook to Tiger (that would be Apple&#8217;s OS X 10.4 for the non-nerds). Everything went very smooth and no &#8230; <a href="http://blog.deconcept.com/2005/05/18/mtv-movie-awards-new-software-flash-forward/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Talk about a busy month! I&#8217;ve been completely swamped with work on the <a href="http://www.mtv.com/onair/movieawards/ma05/" rel="external">MTV Movie awards website</a>. I also upgraded my Powerbook to Tiger (that would be Apple&#8217;s OS X 10.4 for the non-nerds). Everything went very smooth and no hiccups or anything.</p>
<p>I also installed <a href="http://www.adobe.com/products/creativesuite/main.html" rel="external">Adobe&#8217;s CS2 suite</a>, and am enjoying the look and feel of the new apps, although I haven&#8217;t had much time to explore many of the new features. One small note as far as that goes: The Chopping Block did a bunch of work on sample files and other things for the CS2 release, including my <a href="http://blog.deconcept.com/2005/03/31/proper-flash-embedding-flashobject-best-practices/">FlashObject</a> code hiding out in the Web Photo Galleries that use Flash.</p>
<p>And last but not least: I&#8217;ll be speaking at the next <a href="http://www.flashforwardconference.com/" rel="external">Flash Forward</a> in New York on July 6th to the 8th. I&#8217;m sharing a session with Matthew (one of the owners of The Chopping Block) that will be a sort of Chopping Block retrospective with our technical secrets mixed in. Most likely it will be lots of talk about Flash and the role it has played over the last 10 years or so, and where Flash will be going in the near future, and how to use it effectively. Translation: lots of talk about hybrid XHTML/Flash websites and using Javscript (FlashObject) to embed your Flash movies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.deconcept.com/2005/05/18/mtv-movie-awards-new-software-flash-forward/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s next for the iPod?</title>
		<link>http://blog.deconcept.com/2005/02/02/whats-next-for-the-ipod/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.deconcept.com/2005/02/02/whats-next-for-the-ipod/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2005 19:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.deconcept.com/2005/02/02/whats-next-for-the-ipod/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just saw a post over on 37 signals blog asking whether the iPod is riding a wave of cool or a wave of usefulness. &#8230; I’m wondering when the iPod will tip from cool to uncool. When everyone has &#8230; <a href="http://blog.deconcept.com/2005/02/02/whats-next-for-the-ipod/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just saw <a href="http://www.37signals.com/svn/archives/001037.php" rel="external">a post</a> over on <a href="http://www.37signals.com/" rel="external">37 signals</a> blog asking whether the iPod is riding a wave of cool or a wave of usefulness.</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.37signals.com/svn/archives/001037.php"><p>&#8230; I’m wondering when the iPod will tip from cool to uncool. When everyone has something it begins to lose its luster. What can Apple do to ride the wave of coolness for as long as possible? Or is this product somehow immune because of its unique combination of coolness, usefulness, and stylishness? I wonder if the wave Apple is riding isn’t the “cool” wave afterall, but the “useful” wave masquerading as cool? Does anyone ever get tired of useful?</p></blockquote>
<p>I see it like this: iPods are filling a gap that needed to be filled. People needed a portable way to listen to all those mp3s they downloaded from Napster, and the iPod was (and still is) the best way to do that.</p>
<p>However, I think the lives of all portable audio players are limited because cell phones are going to catch up soon. Why carry an iPod and a cellphone when you can plug some headphones into your phone and have all your music right there? Most new cell phones already play mp3 files, the only problem is storage, and that problem is becoming less and less every day as flash memory gets cheaper and bigger.</p>
<p>After that, we&#8217;ll see better digital cameras included in the phones. I&#8217;m not talking about replacing high end cameras, but have you noticed the flood of tiny cameras on the market? Nearly everyone I know has a tiny camera they carry around with them everywhere (not even including the cameras on their phones). Once these camera phones catch up to the little digital cameras, you have no reason to carry both gadgets.</p>
<p>Next comes the most interesting part: You start using your phone to download music directly from the iTunes store. Apple has already announced the <a href="http://www.motorola.com/content/0,,2645,00.html" rel="external">partnership with Motorola</a>, and I&#8217;m sure they understand that the life of the iPod is running out. Motorolapod Shuffle, anyone?</p>
<p>Now back to the camera: tons of people are already taking pictures with thier camera phones and e-mailing them directly to their friends, or <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/cameraphone" rel="external">posting them on the internet</a> with sites like <a href="http://www.flickr.com/" rel="external">Flickr</a>.</p>
<p>Why would I buy three different gadgets and fill up my pockets when I could combine them all into one? It&#8217;s only a matter of time before phone manufacturers add in more storage space for your mp3s, and hopefully they will stop blindly adding in mega pixels to their cameras and put some better lenses and CCD technology into the camera part of the phone.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE (02-14-2005):</strong> <a href="http://www.engadget.com/entry/1234000717031666/" rel="external">Sony Ericsson seems to agree with me, at least about the music part.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.deconcept.com/2005/02/02/whats-next-for-the-ipod/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sirius + iPod?</title>
		<link>http://blog.deconcept.com/2004/12/06/sirius-ipod/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.deconcept.com/2004/12/06/sirius-ipod/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2004 17:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.deconcept.com/2004/12/06/sirius-ipod/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just saw this rumor that Apple might be teaming up with Sirius to add satellite reception into new iPods. Now to me, this seems a little strange, since XM Radio already has an iPod-like receiver, and to me seems &#8230; <a href="http://blog.deconcept.com/2004/12/06/sirius-ipod/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just saw this rumor that Apple might be teaming up with Sirius to add <a href="http://www.mp3newswire.net/stories/2004/ipodsatellite.html" rel="external">satellite reception into new iPods</a>.</p>
<p>Now to me, this seems a little strange, since XM Radio already has an iPod-like receiver, and to me seems to be more &#8216;Apple-like&#8217; than Sirius. XM&#8217;s music is a more eclectic mix, while Sirius seems to play more pop music geared towards a younger audience (Eminem even has his own show on Sirius). Apple has in the past aligned themselves with the older geek chic crowd (U2 iPod, anyone?) rather than the young pop loving crowd. Or maybe I&#8217;m just giving U2 more credit than they deserve, and they are nothing more than a gateway for Apple to get out of their geek cult status and into the pop culture arena.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s also a ton of other reasons why we probably won&#8217;t see satellite radio (either flavor) in iPods anytime soon:</p>
<ol>
<li>Apple won&#8217;t do anything to make the iPod bigger. Have you seen portable satellite radios? They are <em>huge</em>.</li>
<li>Recording. XM just released a little portable player that has a Tivo-like feature, but right now there is no way to get those recordings off of the player. If you could record radio onto your iPod hackers would surely find a quick and easy way to take those recordings off, which makes the RIAA <em>very angry</em>. Without recording capabilities, why bog down your iPod with a service that most users won&#8217;t even pay to use?</li>
<li>You have to pay for satellite radio. Will Apple really bundle a feature you have to pay for with something like the iPod? Maybe if Apple got a cut of the profits, or owned the service (like .mac)</li>
</ol>
<p>So unless there is some major announcement from Sirius that includes a <em>very</em> tiny new portable player, I don&#8217;t see iPods with satellite reception any time soon.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE (02-09-2005):</strong> <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2005/02/09/news/midcaps/sirius_ipod/index.htm" rel="external">Apple says &#8216;hell no&#8217;</a> to putting a satellite radio in their box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.deconcept.com/2004/12/06/sirius-ipod/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OS X + Flash player tip of the day</title>
		<link>http://blog.deconcept.com/2004/10/23/os-x-flash-player-tip-of-the-day/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.deconcept.com/2004/10/23/os-x-flash-player-tip-of-the-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2004 12:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.deconcept.com/2004/10/23/os-x-flash-player-tip-of-the-day/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since buying my first Mac about a year ago, the biggest thing I&#8217;ve missed is being able to run as many Flash movies as I want in my open browser windows and not have to put up with choppy playback. &#8230; <a href="http://blog.deconcept.com/2004/10/23/os-x-flash-player-tip-of-the-day/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since buying my first Mac about a year ago, the biggest thing I&#8217;ve missed is being able to run as many Flash movies as I want in my open browser windows and not have to put up with choppy playback. Anyone who has used a Mac has probably noticed this behavior: open more than one Flash movie at a time (although sometimes it only takes one) and they get very very choppy and slow.</p>
<p>Well, until we get that long awaited <a href="http://www.mozilla.org/press/mozilla-2004-06-30.html" title="MOZILLA FOUNDATION ANNOUNCES MORE OPEN, SCRIPTABLE PLUGINS" rel="external">update to the Netscape plugin architecture</a>, you can try this: When you see a Flash movie start to slow down or get choppy, try clicking and holding your mouse down somewhere inside the movie. It should play at normal speed as long as you hold down the mouse button.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE:</strong> Of course, the same day I post this, Colin Moock posts a video from a Flash conference in Tokyo with a <a href="http://www.moock.org/blog/archives/000146.html" rel="external">demo of the next version of the Flash player</a>.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE (11-30-2005):</strong> With the release of Firefox 1.5 they have <a href="http://weblogs.macromedia.com/emmy/archives/2005/11/firefox_15_avai.cfm" rel="external">fixed a bug</a> that has been in Firefox since 2001, so the &#8216;hold your mouse button down to get good performance&#8217; trick is no longer neccesary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.deconcept.com/2004/10/23/os-x-flash-player-tip-of-the-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

