<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>deconcept &#187; blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.deconcept.com/category/blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.deconcept.com</link>
	<description>You&#039;ve got your good thing, and I&#039;ve got mine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:14:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Redesigned</title>
		<link>http://blog.deconcept.com/2008/04/14/redesigned/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.deconcept.com/2008/04/14/redesigned/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 21:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redesign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.blog.deconcept.com/?p=183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s been nearly three and a half years since I starting writing about nerdy things on this blog, and during that whole time the design has stayed mostly the same. Today I&#8217;m launching a new design, mostly because I&#8217;ve been &#8230; <a href="http://blog.deconcept.com/2008/04/14/redesigned/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been nearly three and a half years since I starting writing about nerdy things on this blog, and during that whole time the design has stayed mostly the same. Today I&#8217;m launching a new design, mostly because I&#8217;ve been procrastinating about upgrading the <a href="http://wordpress.org/" rel="external">WordPress</a> version the blog runs on (it was still 1.2!). So since my old &#8216;theme&#8217; wasn&#8217;t even compatible with the new version, I decided to update the look a bit. I started with a version of the theme &#8216;Hemingway&#8217; (Or is it &#8216;Ninjamonkeys&#8217;? Whatever.) Anyway, here&#8217;s the new design, running on the shiny new version 2.5 of WordPress. I hope you like it, and if there&#8217;s any bugs I&#8217;ll hopefully be able to work them out over the coming weeks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.deconcept.com/2008/04/14/redesigned/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>24 in 48 take two</title>
		<link>http://blog.deconcept.com/2005/02/19/24-in-48-take-two/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.deconcept.com/2005/02/19/24-in-48-take-two/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2005 23:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york city]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.deconcept.com/2005/02/19/24-in-48-take-two/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The second round of 24 in 48 is going on this weekend. I participated in it last time and it was a blast. Go check it out.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The second round of 24 in 48 is going on this weekend. <a href="http://blog.deconcept.com/2004/11/19/24-in-48/">I participated</a> in it last time and it was a blast. <a href="http://www.24in48.org/" rel="external">Go check it out</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.deconcept.com/2005/02/19/24-in-48-take-two/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FlashObject embed Textpattern and WordPress plugin</title>
		<link>http://blog.deconcept.com/2005/02/17/flashobject-embed-textpattern-and-wordpress-plugin/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.deconcept.com/2005/02/17/flashobject-embed-textpattern-and-wordpress-plugin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 16:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[javascript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.deconcept.com/2005/02/17/flashobject-embed-textpattern-and-wordpress-plugin/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATE (02-25-2005): See comments below for an updated version. Michael Bester has put together a plugin for WordPress and Textpattern that makes it really easy to use my FlashObject embed method in your blog. Go check out his post about &#8230; <a href="http://blog.deconcept.com/2005/02/17/flashobject-embed-textpattern-and-wordpress-plugin/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>UPDATE (02-25-2005):</strong> See comments below for an updated version.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.kimili.com/" rel="external">Michael Bester</a> has put together a plugin for WordPress and Textpattern that makes it really easy to use my <a href="http://blog.deconcept.com/2004/10/14/web-standards-compliant-javascript-flash-detect-and-embed/">FlashObject</a> embed method in your blog.</p>
<p>Go <a href="http://www.kimili.com/journal/38/kimili-flash-embed---wordpress-edition/" rel="external">check out his post</a> about it to get the files and all the info you need to use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.deconcept.com/2005/02/17/flashobject-embed-textpattern-and-wordpress-plugin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WordPress next / previous post links</title>
		<link>http://blog.deconcept.com/2005/02/07/wordpress-next-previous-post-links/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.deconcept.com/2005/02/07/wordpress-next-previous-post-links/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2005 05:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[css]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.deconcept.com/2005/02/07/wordpress-next-previous-post-links/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just added some next / previous post links to this blog. It was really easy to do it, and I think it is a very nice improvement. All of the functions are already built into WordPress, it was just &#8230; <a href="http://blog.deconcept.com/2005/02/07/wordpress-next-previous-post-links/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just added some next / previous post links to this blog. It was really easy to do it, and I think it is a very nice improvement. All of the functions are already built into WordPress, it was just a matter of <a href="http://codex.wordpress.org/Template_Tags/next_post" rel="external">finding them</a>.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the PHP code to place where you want the links to show up:</p>
<blockquote><p><code>&lt;?php if($single) { ?&gt;<br />
&lt;div class="nextprev"&gt;<br />
&lt;span class="prev"&gt;&lt;?php previous_post('&amp;lsaquo; %', '', 'yes', 'no'); ?&gt;&lt;/span&gt;<br />
&lt;span class="next"&gt;&lt;?php next_post('% &amp;rsaquo;', '', 'yes', 'no'); ?&gt;&lt;/span&gt;<br />
&lt;/div&gt;<br />
&lt;?php } ?&gt;</code></p></blockquote>
<p>And here&#8217;s the CSS I added to my stylesheet to get them to sit where I wanted them:</p>
<blockquote><pre><code>.nextprev {
    height: 1.5em;
}
.nextprev .prev {
    float: left;
}
.nextprev .next {
    float: right;
}</code></pre>
</blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m not entirely sure they will stay. I might replace them with something different, like a &#8220;more posts in this category&#8221; or a &#8220;related posts&#8221; type setup. I like the idea of flipping through a blog in a linear fashion, and I think it suits this blog quite well since all the content is generally about interesting <a href="http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,64596,00.html" rel="external">internet</a> happenings or loosely related technical offerings.</p>
<p>Either way, it&#8217;s pretty simple to add them to your own blog, so enjoy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.deconcept.com/2005/02/07/wordpress-next-previous-post-links/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Categories and tags and keywords</title>
		<link>http://blog.deconcept.com/2005/01/18/categories-or-tags/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.deconcept.com/2005/01/18/categories-or-tags/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 03:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.deconcept.com/2005/01/18/categories-or-tags/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Technorati recently unveiled a new feature for their little search engine that tries to categorize content by keywords (they call them &#8216;tags&#8216; just like Flickr does). They even pull images from Flickr.com and links from del.icio.us. While it&#8217;s a very &#8230; <a href="http://blog.deconcept.com/2005/01/18/categories-or-tags/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.technorati.com/" rel="external">Technorati</a> recently unveiled a <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/" rel="external">new feature</a> for their little search engine that tries to categorize content by keywords (they call them &#8216;<a href="http://www.technorati.com/help/tags.html" rel="external">tags</a>&#8216; just like Flickr does). They even pull images from <a href="http://www.flickr.com/" rel="external">Flickr.com</a> and links from <a href="http://del.icio.us/" rel="external">del.icio.us</a>. While it&#8217;s a very neat idea, there are some problems with with the whole <a href="http://www.adammathes.com/academic/computer-mediated-communication/folksonomies.html" rel="external">mob taxonomy</a> thing. Mainly with words that have multiple meanings, like the <a href="http://www.technorati.com/tag/flash" rel="external">flash tag</a>, which shows you plenty of Macromedia Flash related content, along side some photography using flashes and even some posts about flash memory mixed in there.</p>
<p>But these small drawbacks aren&#8217;t enough to keep me away. I&#8217;ve added a few categories to this blog and edited some old posts to better categorize them. Technorati should pick up on the new categories and automagically add my posts into their tag system. Some of my posts are already there, but since they were so poorly &#8216;tagged&#8217; it wasn&#8217;t doing me any good. Another benefit to this is that with more categories and using mod_rewrite with WordPress, I should see some more traffic coming in from Google as it indexes all the new keywords in my category URIs. It should also help users who aren&#8217;t sure what this site is about by showing them a nice broad list of topics in the sidebar instead of the limited topics I had before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.deconcept.com/2005/01/18/categories-or-tags/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Random WordPress comment spam</title>
		<link>http://blog.deconcept.com/2004/12/26/random-wordpress-comment-spam/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.deconcept.com/2004/12/26/random-wordpress-comment-spam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Dec 2004 04:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.deconcept.com/2004/12/26/random-wordpress-comment-spam/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, for x-mas I got an amazing amount of comment spam. And the best part is that it doesn&#8217;t even advertise for anything. I recently renamed my wp-comments-post.php file to try and cut back on the comment spam I was &#8230; <a href="http://blog.deconcept.com/2004/12/26/random-wordpress-comment-spam/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, for x-mas I got an amazing amount of comment spam. And the best part is that it doesn&#8217;t even advertise for anything. I recently renamed my wp-comments-post.php file to try and cut back on the comment spam I was getting, and it was working until today. The worst part is that the spam isn&#8217;t even advertising anything, it&#8217;s just random characters and random names, so I can&#8217;t filter it at all. It&#8217;s like someone just wants to annoy me.</p>
<p>So not cool.</p>
<p>Anyone have new suggestions on how to cut back on the spam? I&#8217;d like to implement a forced preview for my comments anyway, so maybe there are new WordPress plugins out since the last time I checked a few weeks ago that can help me out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.deconcept.com/2004/12/26/random-wordpress-comment-spam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>24 in 48</title>
		<link>http://blog.deconcept.com/2004/11/19/24-in-48/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.deconcept.com/2004/11/19/24-in-48/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2004 20:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york city]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.deconcept.com/2004/11/19/24-in-48/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m participating in a little group moblogging project for the next two days thought up by Lia Bulaong. Otherwise known as &#8216;find stuff to take pictures of a couple times an hour.&#8217; It&#8217;s harder than it sounds. After most of &#8230; <a href="http://blog.deconcept.com/2004/11/19/24-in-48/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m participating in a little group moblogging project for the next two days thought up by <a href="http://24in48.org/people/lia/">Lia Bulaong</a>. Otherwise known as &#8216;find stuff to take pictures of a couple times an hour.&#8217; It&#8217;s harder than it sounds. After most of a day at work, I&#8217;m finding myself running out of interesting things to take pictures of (how many times can you take pictures of your office/co-workers in a day?)</p>
<p>But still it&#8217;s a cool idea and I&#8217;m having fun finding distractions between my huge piles of work this week[end].</p>
<blockquote><p> this is a group moblog event, sharing the lives of 24 people over 48 hours in new york city.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://24in48.org/" rel="external">http://24in48.org/</a></p>
<p><strong>UPDATE:</strong> <a href="http://24in48.org/people/geoff/" rel="external">Here&#8217;s my pics so far</a>.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE:</strong> It all finished up last night at midnight, so now it&#8217;s fun to go and compare pics of what people were doing. Take for instance each person&#8217;s first picture of themselves(?) on Friday morning: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ranjit/1574209/">Ranjit</a>, <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/59185035@N00/1573271/">Karen</a>, <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/lia/1570468/">Lia</a>, <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/dpstyles/1576370/">Dennis</a>, <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/geegaw/1575007/">Miranda</a>, <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/kirimobile/1569225/">Kiri</a>, <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/miserychick/1573790/">Ann</a>, <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/witold/1570979/">Witold</a>, <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/cshirky/1569655/">Clay</a>. I&#8217;ve never met any of these people, so it was kind of odd watching their lives. I guess it was like reality TV but one frame at a time. And with little or no narration or dialog (other than the pictures themselves, of course).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.deconcept.com/2004/11/19/24-in-48/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WordPress author comment highlighting</title>
		<link>http://blog.deconcept.com/2004/11/13/wordpress-author-comment-highlighting/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.deconcept.com/2004/11/13/wordpress-author-comment-highlighting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2004 22:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.deconcept.com/2004/11/13/wordpress-author-comment-highlighting/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve noticed a few people doing &#8216;author comment highlighting&#8217; on other blogs, and thought it was kinda neat. How often are you reading through comments on a blog and not realizing that the person commenting is the owner of the &#8230; <a href="http://blog.deconcept.com/2004/11/13/wordpress-author-comment-highlighting/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve noticed a few people doing &#8216;author comment highlighting&#8217; on other blogs, and thought it was kinda neat. How often are you reading through comments on a blog and not realizing that the person commenting is the owner of the blog?</p>
<p>Well, why not highlight your own comments on your own blog so your visitors know it&#8217;s you?</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s how I added it to this blog:</p>
<p>1) I decided to highlight the comments based on my e-mail address. This means that every comment post that uses my e-mail will be marked as &#8216;special.&#8217;</p>
<p>To do this I used a small snippet of PHP code (new code is bold):</p>
<blockquote><p><code>&lt;li id="comment-&lt;?php comment_ID() ?&gt;"<strong>&lt;?php if ($comment-&gt;comment_author_email == "geoff@deconcept.com") { ?&gt; class="mycomment"&lt;?php } ?&gt;</strong>&gt;</code></p></blockquote>
<p>2) Edit your stylesheet so your posts are different. Since I added the class <code>mycomment</code> to the comments I make, I added this to my stylesheet:</p>
<blockquote><p><code>ol#commentlist li.mycomment {<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;background-color: #fbfbfb;<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;border: solid 1px #457AA5;<br />
}<br />
</code></p></blockquote>
<p>3) Make sure nobody can post comments by pretending to be you:</p>
<p>I think everyone should do this on their blog anyway, but here it comes in extra handy. I went into &#8216;options -&gt;discussion&#8217; in wordpress and added my e-mail address to the list under &#8216;Comment Moderation.&#8217; This assures that if a comment containing my e-mail address anywhere in the post, the comment will be held for approval by me. So every time I post a comment I&#8217;ll have to approve it before it shows up, but this isn&#8217;t really a big deal and takes almost no time at all to do.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure there are ways to improve this and make it better, like checking all of the author e-mail addresses, and possibly giving each author their own unique css class so they can each have their own look, and then packaging all of this up into a WordPress plugin&#8230; But I&#8217;m much too lazy for that, and since this works fine for my single user blog, I&#8217;ll probably just leave it like this.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE (4-28-05):</strong> Just saw <a href="http://wordpress.org/support/topic/27600" rel="external">this post</a> on the WordPress support blog that updates this for use with WordPress 1.5 and also supports alternate post highlighting as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.deconcept.com/2004/11/13/wordpress-author-comment-highlighting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flickr possibilities</title>
		<link>http://blog.deconcept.com/2004/10/28/flickr-possibilities/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.deconcept.com/2004/10/28/flickr-possibilities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2004 12:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nerdery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.deconcept.com/2004/10/28/flickr-possibilities/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By now everyone and their mom has heard of Flickr, that handy photo sharing website that is so awesome. Well I had this little idea for a cool new feature they could add: Right now they have a handy &#8216;tag&#8217; &#8230; <a href="http://blog.deconcept.com/2004/10/28/flickr-possibilities/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By now everyone and their mom has heard of <a href="http://www.flickr.com" rel="external">Flickr</a>, that handy photo sharing website that is so awesome.</p>
<p>Well I had this little idea for a cool new feature they could add:</p>
<p>Right now they have a handy &#8216;tag&#8217; system that works like keywords. This is cool when you want to see all the photos that are of &#8216;cats,&#8217; but what if I wanted to see pictures of current events? When <a href="http://www.brandonstone.com" rel="external">Brandon</a> started up <a href="http://www.photoblogs.org" rel="external">photoblogs.org</a>, he had the top 100 photoblogs listed there, and that&#8217;s cool and all, but it starts to suck when time goes on, and the list is always roughly the same. So I said &#8220;Hey, you should put a &#8216;recent popular sites&#8217; on there.&#8221; So he added this nifty little section called <a href="http://www.photoblogs.org/top/newcomers/" rel="external">Top newcomers</a> and it works like this:</p>
<blockquote><p>These are the top 10 registered photoblogs that have been added to Photoblogs.org within the last 4 months. Rankings are derived from the favorites lists of our users. In case of a tie, older sites are ranked higher.</p></blockquote>
<p>Flickr could benifit from something similar to this: limit the time to one week or maybe even just a few days, and then list which tags are the most popular for that time period. The information may already be there if they store a timestamp with when a photo was tagged, but even if they don&#8217;t, it might be pretty easy to add in.</p>
<p>The reason I started thinking about this was on my way home from the coffee shop tonight I saw some people staring up at the moon. Now I consider my self a pretty connected person, and take breaks from work all day to read the goings on in the world and <a href="http://www.bloglines.com/public/deconcept" rel="external">a bunch of blogs</a> too, but for some reason I didn&#8217;t hear one peep about this <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A2333-2004Oct27.html" rel="external">lunar eclipse</a> that happened.</p>
<p>Anyway, imagine that you just read something in the paper about a big protest, or about some huge natural disaster, or a lunar eclipse&#8230; and you go to Flickr and look at the recent &#8216;hot tags&#8217; and get to see tons of images all of the things going on in the world right now (or last week as it may be). Or maybe, you completely miss a lunar eclipse because nobody tells you about it, but you still get to see all the pictures people took because you visit the Flickr &#8216;hot tags&#8217; page every morning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.deconcept.com/2004/10/28/flickr-possibilities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Have you seen my new blog ad?</title>
		<link>http://blog.deconcept.com/2004/10/19/have-you-seen-my-new-blog-ad/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.deconcept.com/2004/10/19/have-you-seen-my-new-blog-ad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2004 01:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.deconcept.com/2004/10/19/have-you-seen-my-new-blog-ad/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jason Kottke posted a little thing about technorati&#8217;s top 100 most-linked weblogs and ponders whether &#8216;commercial&#8217; weblogs belong in the list or not. Just a couple of years ago, almost every weblog on a top 100 list would have been &#8230; <a href="http://blog.deconcept.com/2004/10/19/have-you-seen-my-new-blog-ad/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.kottke.org/04/10/weblog-advertising" rel="external">Jason Kottke</a> posted a little thing about <a href="http://technorati.com/live/top100.html" rel="external">technorati&#8217;s top 100 most-linked weblogs</a> and ponders whether &#8216;commercial&#8217; weblogs belong in the list or not.</p>
<blockquote><p>Just a couple of years ago, almost every weblog on a top 100 list would have been noncommerical and the blogosphere in general was mostly opposed to advertising on blogs. Now it&#8217;s accepted to the point where I haven&#8217;t heard anyone complain about it in months&#8230;even Boing Boing&#8217;s audience didn&#8217;t protest too much when they added advertising a couple of months ago.</p></blockquote>
<p>I agree that the flaw here is in the definition of what a &#8216;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weblog" rel="external">weblog</a>&#8216; is. The term is very broad technically, but the general public only sees them as little personal websites, and the name still carries with it a personal or grassroots connotation.</p>
<p>The problem now is that these &#8216;commercial&#8217; weblogs get mixed in with personal weblogs that have no interest in being corporate. So you get people trying to harness the weblog name and make a few bucks off of it. Everyone and their mom wants a weblog because they work. They are simple to follow, Google* loves them and rewards them for that (perhaps more than it should in some cases?). What people aren&#8217;t realizing is that the whole reason weblogs were great in the first place was because they were more personal than the cold, banner ad filled internet sites of a few years ago.</p>
<p>I feel that as more and more ads pile up, people will be alienated more and more until the next big thing comes along and we start all over again.</p>
<p>The question really is who will throw the first stone?</p>
<p>The question after that is what do you call all of these commercial blogs that will be left over?</p>
<p><small>* When I say Google, of course I mean search engines in general.</small></p>
<p><strong>UPDATE (10-21-2004):</strong> <a href="http://doc.weblogs.com/discuss/msgReader$5094" rel="external">Doc Searls put up a post</a> about blog ads, and included a comment in response to my post above:</p>
<blockquote><p>Meanwhile, there&#8217;s this sense that blogs with ads (I just wrote &#8220;ads with blogs&#8221;&#8230; Freudian slip?) are &#8220;commercial,&#8221; while blogs without ads are not. That&#8217;s a new one on me. <strong>Really, are BoingBoing, Instapundit or Moxie different with ads than they were without them?</strong> I&#8217;d say yes, but I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;s in a bad way. They ugly up the pages, but they also say stuff the authors want said. The equivalent of bumper stickers, seems to me. Not &#8220;commercialization&#8221; in the usual meaning of the term. (emphasis mine)</p></blockquote>
<p>To answer the question: the answer is most definitely yes (and he seems to agree with me, but not agree at the same time? I don&#8217;t get it). Once a blog gets to be so big that the author can&#8217;t afford to keep it going without additional income and puts up ads for that reason, they become reliant on that income. They will post things more likely to bring crowds or potention click throughs instead of your every day &#8216;whatever&#8217; content. Is this really a bad thing? I&#8217;m sure in some cases it might not change things too much, but in others it would cause a narrowing of the content on that blog. If something isn&#8217;t interesting enough, maybe the author would skip over it in persiut of something more main stream.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a reason why Clear Channel sticks mainly to the top 40 music format. They get the most listeners that way, and therefore can charge their advertisers more and make more money. Blog advertising works the same way: the more viewers, the more cash for your ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.deconcept.com/2004/10/19/have-you-seen-my-new-blog-ad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What does a permalink look like?</title>
		<link>http://blog.deconcept.com/2004/10/16/what-does-a-permalink-look-like/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.deconcept.com/2004/10/16/what-does-a-permalink-look-like/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2004 17:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.deconcept.com/2004/10/16/what-does-a-permalink-look-like/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you were a permalink, what would you look like? I&#8217;ve decided to add a permalink symbol (or graphic) to each post to make it more apparent how to link directly to a single post. WordPress (the blogging software this &#8230; <a href="http://blog.deconcept.com/2004/10/16/what-does-a-permalink-look-like/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you were a permalink, what would you look like?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve decided to add a permalink symbol (or graphic) to each post to make it more apparent how to link directly to a single post. WordPress (the blogging software this site uses) by default makes the title of each post the permalink for that post. But before I add anything, I thought I would ask and see what everyone thinks these links should look like.</p>
<p>I would venture that the text &#8220;Permanent link&#8221; is the most user friendly, however, it takes up a lot of space and doesn&#8217;t really look very nice. So in trying to balance looks with usability, I want a graphic or symbol that conveys &#8220;click me, I&#8217;m permanent.&#8221;</p>
<p>Here are a few samples from other blogs:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.kottke.org" rel="external">Kottke</a>: <img src="/images/2004/10/pl_kottke.gif" alt="Permalink" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.instapundit.com" rel="external">Instapundit</a>: <img src="/images/2004/10/pl_instapundit.gif" alt="Permalink" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.dashes.com/anil/" rel="external">Anil Dash</a>: ¶</p>
<p><a href="http://www.37signals.com/svn/" rel="external">37 Signals SvN</a>: <img src="/images/2004/10/pl_37signals.gif" alt="Permalink" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.waxy.org" rel="external">Waxy.org</a>: <img src="/images/2004/10/pl_waxy.gif" alt="Permalink" /> (with text &#8220;PERM LINK&#8221; next to it)</p>
<p>And of course, we always have the generic: #</p>
<p>I also <a href="http://images.google.com/images?q=permalink.gif&#038;btnG=Search&#038;svnum=20&#038;hl=en&#038;lr=&#038;imgsz=icon&#038;safe=off" rel="external">asked Google</a> what it thought a permalink looked like.</p>
<p>I like a couple of these, but I&#8217;m not sure they really say &#8220;I&#8217;m a permanent link.&#8221;</p>
<p>The next task is determining placement. Should the permalink go next to the title of the post? Next to the date? Next to the comments link? Maybe we could leave it all alone adjacent to the comments link, or somewhere else new and exciting?</p>
<p>My last comment is on the word &#8216;permalink.&#8217; Is it descriptive enough for a new internet user to figure out the meaning? I&#8217;m not so sure, and I think I&#8217;ll be using the words &#8216;permanent link&#8217; as alternate text for mine.</p>
<p>Maybe it&#8217;s time the blogging world got together and established a standard (suggested, of course) graphic or word for these permalinks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.deconcept.com/2004/10/16/what-does-a-permalink-look-like/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

