Not signed in (Sign In)

Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Vista and swfobject

Bottom of Page

1 to 6 of 6

  1.  
    • CommentAuthorrkrater
    • CommentTimeFeb 20th 2007
     
    i have just upgrade to vista now swfobject and adobe's AC_OETags.js does not work. Anyone else have this problem?
    • CommentAuthorGeoff
    • CommentTimeFeb 21st 2007
     
    can you be more specific?
    • CommentAuthorrkrater
    • CommentTimeFeb 22nd 2007
     
    when i vist your http://blog.deconcept.com/swfobject/swfobject.html page i get your "need to upgrade" message. but when i click your bypass link http://blog.deconcept.com/swfobject/swfobject.html?detectflash=false the swf shows up and runs. I have went into IE options and rest the options to default and restored all zones to default as well.
    • CommentAuthorGeoff
    • CommentTimeFeb 22nd 2007
     
    • CommentAuthorSkin
    • CommentTimeMay 28th 2007
     
    I've just had the same problem, after a fresh install of windows vista business all swfobject flash movies stopped to work. I had this problem more then one time, also on windows xp, and yesterday I saw that a friend on his PC wouldn't see sfwobjec flash files....

    I think it is not a professional solution to unistall and install flash player, because 99% of internet user are not able and don't like to work only to see a site, so probably 99% of people with this problem will go in another site .-( and they will see that flash videos in other sites works.
  6.  
    I agree with Skin.

    sfwObject has become very common use to get around the Active X issue and to help those who are not as web savvy. Although uninstalling and reinstalling Flash did fix my IE7 problem on Windows Vista, I would venture to guess that most people viewing my site will not be so comfortable in following this solution.

    I don't understand why a corrupt install of Flash would work with standard embed tags, but not swfObject unless we uninstall and reinstall the plug-in. Have you been able to find a work around on your end that would not require our users to take these steps?

1 to 6 of 6

  1.